All Texans are American, but not all Americans are Texan.
Ignoring the shout from the peanut gallery ("And thank God for that!"), I
will proceed.
For some time, most Americans and even a few Texans have been aware that the
condition of "Texanness" is problematic. Texans generally see no reason
whatever to venture outside the borders of Texas (again, we hear the voice from the peanut
gallery), believing that the state is Gods own country.
When Texans do decide to travel, people everywhere have noticed there is something
about them (speech? attire? attitude? affluence-on-parade?) that is somewhat irritating.
Traveling Texans usually dont notice such reactions. If they do notice, they
interpret them as quaint, entertaining native customs.
For as long as weve had Texas in the world, all of this has been a given and
everybody sort of got used to it.
Then came the 43rd president of the United States, who wore his Texanness on
his sleeve, and it all became too much, both for people outside of Texas and for
at least one person inside the state who could be described as a thinking Texan.
Given the scale and scope of global problems generally, I have spent most of my adult
life 1) as a resident of Texas and 2) trying to think and live less as a citizen of that
principality and more as a citizen of the world. Ephemerae such as "nationality"
seemed to belong pretty far down on the list of things to worry about.
Then another of that endless series of surprises which comprise
"life" brought me up short. Like this:
Not long ago, circumstances were such that it was time to sell the house and move.
Those circumstances happened to coincide with a period when I was, with considerable
delight, making my way through a series of novels, all of which are set in a certain
beautiful state just to the west of Texas.
Pondering the problems of selling, moving, and buying, I one night sat bolt upright in
bed with the (for a Texan) astonishingand liberating thought: "Why
not move to New Mexico!!!"
Non-Texans may already be guffawing at the fact that I would find this idea
astonishing, and if you are, I understand.
I assure you that any Texans who have read this far are not guffawing. They
are, most of them, in shock at the mere suggestion of Leaving.
Frankly, so was I at first. How could I, a lifelong Texan, produce such a heretical
thought?
But I had produced it, so I pondered further. The more I pondered, the better I felt: What
a glorious thing life might be without this burden of permanently nested Texanness!
I played out fantasies of waking up EVERY MORNING in a place that WASNT
TEXAS and was forced to see clearly how much my (supposedly cosmopolitan,
global-citizen) life was shaped by 1) having been born in Texas, and 2) keeping a Texas
address as my primary residence.
Over the years Ive written my share (actually, I often choose to think,
MORE than my share) of scathing satire about Texanness. But this new thought of
Leaving opened undreamt of vistas of hope. What insights, impossible of access in Texas,
might I not gain by, say, waking up every morning in Santa Fe?
Obviously, my tongue is in cheek here, Reader, but I must remind you, it is only partly
in cheek. Im nailing myself and my own heritage and burden of provinciality. If you
bear with me, Im about to nail yours as well.
For, you see, the problem of living in a place of such extremes as Texas is more
complex than those who dont live here might think. Easiest to deal with are the
obvious truths and idiocies of the Texas stereotype. Once you start going below
that simple if objectionable surface, you get into real trouble, which consists mainly of a
great deal of wrong, sometimes dangerous, thinking and acting-out on the part of Texans.
Believe me, "Dont Mess with Texas" bumper stickers are the least it.
The result, for anyone making some effort to think his way through life, is a
quite heavy perceived burden. This burden has two parts. One is the sincere
desire to protect Texas from itself and its worst extremes. The other is the equally
sincere desire to protect the rest of vthe world fromand warn it aboutthese
same extremes.
To do less is at the least to acquiesce inand thereby passively approve ofwidespread
stupidity. But doing less can in some cases also mean closing ones eyes to misbehavior
far more serious than mere stupidity. Im thinking, for one example, of the
continuing, frequent state-approved murders carried out at the penitentiary in Huntsville,
Texas.
Having for some days dallied with the fantasies of Leaving, I finally wound up Not
Leaving, which is to say, Staying. Such is the lethargy and momentum of decades of habit
(though limited finances did also play a role). With the decision to Not Leave came
guilt-filled comparisons to those thinking Germans who in the 1930s chose to not leave and
justified their staying as "inner emigration."
That is, I came to see myself as one who was "in Texas" but was not "of
Texas," if you get my rather shaky point.
Blessed (or cursed) with compulsively analogical thinking patterns, I also, during the
period of fantasies of Leaving, could not avoid toying with my OTHER national
allegiance (and here, Reader, is where you get yours).
Yes, I allowed myself the luxury of fantasies about selling the house and moving not
just beyond the borders of Texas but beyond the very borders of the United States.
And you know what? That thought was even more liberating than the thought of leaving
Texas.
If the burden of Texanness is great, I realized, it is as nothing compared to
the burden of Americanness in this period of Yankee hegemony .
Depart, set up shop in Cuernavaca or Rio or Auckland even, and leave Imperial America
to heaven.
Tempting, yes?
But you non-Texan Americans can, for various reasons, no more do that (most of you)
than I could pick up my meager belongings and hie me to New Mexico.
What it came down to was a kind of nationalistic trap. Being a Texan these days is not
so much a matter of double-allegiance. Its more a matter of double-indemnity, or
worse yet, in long-range moral terms, double indemnification.
Here, then, I stay.