Lately the numbers relating to what they see and what their formulas
say they ought to see have been so out of whack that its become necessary for them
to posit the existence of what theyre calling "dark matter" and "dark
energy." The observed behavior of the universe is such a bad fit with the formulas
that our guys have decided it is in fact filled with unseen matter and undetected energy
of a quantity exceeding that of all visible stars and galaxies.
Mind you, not the least whiff of this dark matter has been sensed, perceived,
detected, or measured. But present theory requires that it exist. Otherwise the
whole elaborate structure of contemporary cosmology along with large segments of physics
collapses.
Basically, the problem comes down to this: What we see and more or less know of the
universe (atoms, etc.) amounts to only 4% of what's out there. The other 96% we're
surmising and calling "dark energy" and "dark matter" because present
theory requires its existence.
Well. That's a fine kettle of neutrinos.
Whats a know-nothing-but-concerned-liberal-arts person to do but shake his head,
wish the star-thinkers well
and steal their clever method for explaining the
inexplicable?
If you look at civilization (dark glasses recommended), you are struck by a
certain imbalance in almost every field of endeavor. Since modern science teaches
us that not only does nature abhor a vacuum, it also abhors disequilibrium, we are surely
within our scientific rights to posit various unseen opposites to restore the whole system
of human activity to a state of healthy and safe balance.
For example, consider how out of whack any universe is in which there is only George W.
Bush. If that harmony which modern cosmologists assure us is the rule really
permeates our reality, then surely we must posit the existencesomewhereof an
invisible and wholly better George W. Bush. An Anti-Bush, if you will.
What would, nay, what MUST be the characteristics of this Anti-Bush person? Thats
easy. He smiles instead of smirking. He walks instead of galumphing. He orates instead of
haranguing.
He thinks.
You want proof that the Anti-Bush exists? Tonight, seat yourself in front of the
television and try very hard to watch the Non-Anti-Bush with the eyes of a child. After
having done so, and before you reach for the Prozac, ask yourself: Can any universe worthy
of the name throw up THAT without simultaneously in some distant fairer place throwing up
its lovely and benign opposite? Of course not. Q.E.D.
Those of a more Asian persuasion of course have no problem with this hypothesis. They
have the deeply ingrained metaphysical template called "yin-yang" in which to
plug such an unlikely phenomenon as George W. Bush. Yin, therefore yang. Q.E.D. again.
Mental health requires that we make a habit of constructing
these visible/invisible, unpalatable/tasty dualities. Daily such improbables
parade across the screen of our consciousnessClarence Thomas, Tom DeLay,
Karl Rove, Katherine Harris, Karen Hughes, Kenneth Lay, The Rock, Danielle Steele, James
Baker, Larry King, Barbara Walters, Henry Kissingerthat we are left with a
choice that is no choice. Either we embrace Chaos and Old Night and put on the moth-eaten
plumage of antiquated beliefs, or we embrace the scientific method of our cosmology
brothers and posit a better, balanced universe in which these personages simulatenously
blossom forth elsewhere and invisibly in glistening garments of charity, humility,
forgiveness, and love.
For every Lucasian pseudo-myth here, somewhere there is an epic
pointing truthward; for every forked-tongue out-of-the-corner-of-the-mouth Cheneyism here,
somewhere there is a hard-won aphorism aimed right at the heart; for every chart-topping
language-mangling Grisham opus here, somewhere there is a well-told Tolkien story worth
the telling.
This unseen but entirely necessary Dark Canon of Culture has
the further advantage of being all-inclusive. Not only are objectionable persons
rendered lovely, so too are inanimate and organizational irritants turned into their more
sweetly realized selves.
Think, please. A counter-universe MUST exist with a U.S. House of
Representatives in which there is not a trace of expedience, an Interstate Highway System
teeming with Priuses and nary an SUV in sight, television networks on which the true dirty
word is condescension and the true dirty deed is selling, supermarkets chock full of
veggies and veggie-derived stuff with not one dead animal in sight, schools where children
are taught first to study and know themselves.
You may call it the Land of Cockaigne. I call it High Science, the only proper
inference to be drawn from the extraordinary insights of modern cosmology and
astrophysics.