My Mona Lisa is better than your Mona Lisa
because mine has TWICE as many pixels and FOUR times as many colors.
My SUV is more
phallic than yours because it not only has FOUR-wheel drive it has FOUR wheel
steering and its gas mileage is TWO miles per gallon less than yours.
My CD player is
better than yours because it reads EIGHT times as many bits per second and sounds
TWICE as shrill to a musically trained ear.
My nuclear weapon is
superior to yours because it kills THREE times as many people and simultaneously
does HALF as much property damage.
My corporate Ponzi
scheme disguised as a global corporation is more successful than yours because it
drains the retirement funds of TWENTY times as many employees.
My particle
accelerator is SIX times faster than yours which means I can smash SIXTY times as
many subatomic particles.
My government is more
desirable than yours because it concentrates EIGHTY percent of the wealth in the
hands of ONE percent of the population.
And so on.
Given the all-pervasive compulsion to enumerate, only a fool would try to resist the
momentum of the Zeitgeist. Successful persons these days are those who not only
embrace digitalization of everything but who work to reduce the entire universe including
all human experience to That Which Can Be Counted.
Recently thinking about this cultural reality and at the same time pushed by the
ever-present desire to be Better Digital Citizens, we here in this little cultural
backwater calledl Magellans Log realized that what the world needs is MORE
scales of measurement. Sure, we have rulers, clocks, thermometers, speedometers,
NASDAQ graphs, and so on. But is that really enough?
It happened that, as we were discussing this problem, CNN (which we of course keep on
constantly in the background of our cultural endeavors) was reporting on a seismic event.
The words "5.2 on the Richter Scale" impinged on our digitizing consciousness.
Enlightenment was at hand!
Have you ever noticed how, in news reports about earthquakes, its never,
"There was a 5.2.
earthquake," or,
"There was an earthquake
that measured 5.2," but ALWAYS,
"The earthquake measure
5.2 ON THE RICHTER SCALE"?
Who, besides geologists and members of the Richter family, cares what scale the
earthquake was measured on?
Do the Weather Channels imperturbables ever say, "And the temperature in Des
Moines is minus 20 on the Fahrenheit scale"? "The temperature in Beijing is 18
on the Centigrade scale"?
Whats happening here is a compulsion not only to measure but to show the
hip, scientific correctness of ones measurements.
If you think about this, immediately two avenues combining cultural enrichment and the
making of a lot of money open up.
Go to "Modification of Existing
Scales of Measurement" >>