
The Magellan's Log Diet
Where We Went Wrong
"You are what you eat"? Well, yes and no. Mainly no.
Few people realize that catch-phrase came from one of the founding fathers
(emphasis on "fathers"--we're talking serious patriarachy here) of Modern
Materialism, that fine movement of patriarchal fecal matter which has given us everything
from the trivial (Yugo's, network TV, Rush Limbaugh, and the Bic lighter) to the terrible
(you choose your own examples from the late, unlamented 20th century's various
bloodbaths). Ludwig Feuerbach was a mid-19th century German philosopher who not only
coined the phrase (in German, it reads: "Man ist, was er isst"--which at least
has the benefit of a modest little pun), but who practiced what he preached. As a kind of
primitivist precursor of the vegans, he felt that if he could just get everyone in the
world onto a diet of English peas, the millennium would be at hand ("Peas for
peace"?).
The degree of Feuerbach's victory (hollow though it may have been) can be
judged by a click-stroll through the self-help and health pages of amazon.com. Diet books
by the hundred, yea, verily, by the thousand. The idea seems to be that if we can just get
thin enough and if we can get our misbehaving cholesterol (along with other rowdy blood
contaminants) tamed, things'll be OK.
Linked pages just a click away from the diet shelves confirm the
materialist approach to well-being. There lie page after page of exercise books, volumes
guaranteeing if not enlightenment then at least contented good health on the magic carpet
of endorphin production through intensive body-work. All hail the power of endless reps
and countless laps.
Which is all well and good. The body, which for reasons still not entirely
clear, we are stuck with for lo these three score and ten (soon to be four, five, six
score and many), obviously needs tending to. And it does respond well to whatever TLC we
throw its way, even when the Tender Loving Care edges over into Tough Loving Care on the
old Stairmaster.
But. (You were waiting for the "but", yes?).
Older and wiser heads than those of Herr Feuerbach and his materialist
progeny (do you really want to put your life and future well-being in the hands of
somebody who became rich and famous by toning and shaping the bodies of Beverly Hills?)
long ago came up with a different catch-phrase: You are what you think.
The lineage for this view goes back to the oldest books (the Tao Te Ching,
the I Ching, the Bagavad Gita, the Dhammapada). And, to be fair, this anti-materialist
view has produced its own flood of New Age garbage, ranging from music so vacuous that it
makes you appreciate Muzak to books ("I Found the Faces of Angels in My Bowel
Movements") so ill-thought-out that they make Pat Robertson seem tolerant by
comparison.
The fact is, if you're going to diet, you're wasting your time if you
don't double-diet. Sure. Do the body diet. But without a simultaneous mind diet, you are
getting, every precisely, nowhere.
How Ignorant Are We?
So ignorant that we don't even know we're hungry. Consider the butterfly (so beautiful
that we even overlook its ungainly flitting). It moves about clumsily, but knowing exactly
what food it needs.
Consider us. When it comes to mind nutrition, all we know is this: If you
think in this way (our present, reductive, linear, rationalist mode), you produce this
kind of culture. We've now honed, refined, and focused the rational mode so well that
we've forgotten that we may in fact be starving in the midst of our materialist affluence.
So confident are we in our mechanical success that we've consigned ancient
dieting tips and nutritional guidelines to sect books, rote primers for political
primitivists and the desperately aged. In both cases, these ancient, metaphysical
Pritikens are transformed in to alleged keys for the Gates of Paradise. Which is rather
like mistaking the instructional manual of a car for the car itself.
So if we ask "Are you hungry?", the only honest answer is,
"I don't know."
We are so accustomed to our voluminous, daily intake of socially approved
and rewarded words that we deeply and easily believe we're not hungry, much less starving.
Occasionally, in a time of stress, loss, grief, we may briefly perceive a certain hunger,
a lack. But unless it becomes chronic (we become mentally "ill"), we generally
do nothing to assuage this hunger-that- doesn't exist.
Let's take a look at your present mind intake and find out exactly what
you're putting in your head these days.
Next >>
Send this page to a friend.
Back to Magellan's Log 12
Magellan's
Log front page |